<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: why www? no www!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/</link>
	<description>the web, the net, that thing we all do and love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/comment-page-1/#comment-25582</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/#comment-25582</guid>
		<description>I guess its just a force of habbit, cant teach an old dog new tricks... or something like that hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess its just a force of habbit, cant teach an old dog new tricks&#8230; or something like that hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/comment-page-1/#comment-4828</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlife.com.au/2007/04/18/why-www-no-www/#comment-4828</guid>
		<description>We can only leave the www (and the http:// for that matter) off because our browser compensates. If you were to just have server.com this is a different server location for a non-http protocol. So instead of getting rid of www, we should really be using http:// as well, irrespective of redirects - also you may end up confusing search engine spiders who can&#039;t decide if http://example and http://www.example.com are the same thing or not. A domain is a domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can only leave the www (and the http:// for that matter) off because our browser compensates. If you were to just have server.com this is a different server location for a non-http protocol. So instead of getting rid of www, we should really be using http:// as well, irrespective of redirects &#8211; also you may end up confusing search engine spiders who can&#8217;t decide if <a href="http://example" rel="nofollow">http://example</a> and <a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a> are the same thing or not. A domain is a domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
